Tobin Gets 10 Months for Scheme [Corrected 05/19/06] ; His Role in Election Day Phone Jamming Was an `Assault' On the Democratic Process, the Judge Says.
Portland Press Herald › May 19, 2006
Linked as:
Portland Press Herald › May 19, 2006
Linked as:Summary
A federal prosecutor described James Tobin of Bangor as an indispensable participant in an illegal plot to disrupt an election, while his own lawyer portrayed him Wednesday as an extraordinarily giving family man who made one uncharacteristic mistake. U.S. District Judge Steven McAuliffe made clear that he found both sides' assessments convincing before sentencing Tobin to 10 months in prison, followed by two years of supervised release, for his role in a Republican scheme to jam the opposition's phone lines on Election Day in 2002.
The prison term fell between what the two sides sought, and McAuliffe said it was a difficult sentence to impose.See the full content of this document
Extract
Tobin Gets 10 Months for Scheme [Corrected 05/19/06] ; His Role in Election Day Phone Jamming Was an `Assault' On the Democratic Process, the Judge Says.
The judge noted that he'd never seen an outpouring of support for a defendant like the 161 pages of letters submitted by Tobin's friends and relatives. But he also underlined the gravity of the crime, describing it as a "direct assault" on the democratic...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Red-Letter Day: Americans Overcome Red Cards to Salvage Tie Against the Italians | Udot to Hold Open House About Orem's 800 North | U.S. Is Bracing for Hostility in Mexico | 2 Utahns Are Featured On 'Notable People' List | Sentenza Breve nº 6484 de Consiglio di Stato September 07 2010 | sentencia nº 2495 de consiglio di stato, may 31, 2010 | Sentencia nº 6647 de Consiglio di Stato, December 18, 2007 | Sentencia nº 89 de Consiglio di Stato, January 13, 2010